Reliability-Based Reassessment of Starter-Generator Preventive Maintenance Intervals on ATR 72-212A Aircraft Using Operational Removal Data

  • Yoga Yulasmana Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Nurtanio Bandung, Indonesia
  • Bobi Gumelar Raspati Garuda Maintenance Facility Aero Asia, Tangerang, Indonesia
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.36842/jomase.v70i2.631
Abstract views: 0 ,   pdf downloads: 0
 

Abstract

This paper re-assesses the preventive maintenance interval of starter-generator part number 8260-124 installed on ATR 72-212A aircraft using operational removal data from Airline X between 2019 and 2024. A quantitative case-study approach was applied to 65 removal records, comprising 39 scheduled and 26 unscheduled removals. The analysis included failure-mode classification, Pareto analysis, statistical distribution fitting, Mean Time to Failure estimation, survival analysis, Component Removal Rate, and Mean Time Between Unscheduled Removal. Brush wear was identified as the dominant failure mode, accounting for 53.8% of unscheduled removals. The lognormal distribution provided the best fit to the Time Since Installation data, with an adjusted Anderson–Darling statistic of 0.746 and a correlation coefficient of 0.989. The estimated MTTF was 907.022 flight hours, substantially below the existing 1,200-flight-hour maintenance interval, while the survival probability declined to 51.6% at 900 flight hours and 13.1% at 1,000 flight hours. These findings indicate that the current interval provides insufficient preventive margin. Therefore, an 800-flight-hour interval is recommended to reduce brush-related deterioration, unscheduled removals, and associated operational disruptions.

##Keywords:## ATR 72-212A, Preventive Maintenance Interval, Reliability Analysis, Starter-Generator, Unscheduled Removal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
Jul 30, 2026
How to Cite
YULASMANA, Yoga; RASPATI, Bobi Gumelar. Reliability-Based Reassessment of Starter-Generator Preventive Maintenance Intervals on ATR 72-212A Aircraft Using Operational Removal Data. Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering-, [S.l.], v. 70, n. 2, p. 127-139, july 2026. ISSN 2527-6085. Available at: <https://isomase.org/Journals/index.php/jomase/article/view/631>. Date accessed: 05 aug. 2026. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.36842/jomase.v70i2.631.

References

[1] Thales. (2017). Component Maintenance Manual: Starter Generator 8260-124, CMM 24-32-65-01. France: Thales.
[2] ATR. (2024). Electrical Power - General (ATR-A-24-XX-XX-01001-04CA-A). ATR72 Line Maintenance Manual.
[3] Moubray, J. (1997). Reliability-Centered Maintenance, (2nd ed). New York, NY, USA: Industrial Press, https://books.google.com/books?id=4f3VAAAAMAAJ.
[4] Federal Aviation Administration. (2024). Advisory Circular AC 121-22D: Maintenance Review Boards, Maintenance Type Boards, and Original Equipment Manufacturer/Type Certificate Holder Recommended Maintenance Procedures. https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/advisory_circulars/index.cfm/go/document.information/documentID/1042771.
[5] Mashuri, A., Sumpena, & Yulianti, B. (2022). Zero output voltage pada starter generator pesawat ATR 72-600. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian, 1(4), 2022. https://doi.org/10.62828/jpb.v1i4.35.
[6] Sudri, N. M., Nendissa, B. C. & Herawati, Y. (2012). Analisis sistem perawatan komponen generator starter pada mesin pesawat di PT XYZ, Jurnal Teknik dan Ilmu Komputer, 1(3), 287-293, 2012. https://ejournal.ukrida.ac.id/index.php/TIK/article/view/1335.
[7] Wawrzynski, W., Zieja, M., Tomaszewska, J. & Michalski, M. (2021). Reliability assessment of aircraft commutators. Energies, 14(21), 7404, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14217404.
[8] Zyluk, A., Zieja, M., Wawrzynski, W. & Tomaszewska J. Service life prediction for rotating electrical machines on aircraft in terms of temperature loads. Energies, 16(1), p. 218, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16010218.
[9] Ebeling, C. E. (1997). An Introduction to Reliability and Maintainability Engineering. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill.
[10] Meeker, W. Q. & Escobar, L. A., (1998). Statistical Methods for Reliability Data. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons. https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9780471673279_A23545367/preview-9780471673279_A23545367.pdf.
[11] Kementerian Perhubungan Republik Indonesia, (2006). Civil Aviation Safety Regulation, (CASR) Part 43: Maintenance, Preventive Maintenance, Rebuilding, and Alteration. Jakarta, Indonesia.
[12] SAE International. (2009). SAE JA1011: Evaluation Criteria for Reliability-Centered Maintenance (RCM) Processes. Warrendale, PA, USA. https://www.sae.org/standards/content/ja1011_200908/
[13] Dhillon, B. S. (2005). Reliability, Quality and Safety for Engineers. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.
[14] Jardine, A. K. S. & Tsang, A. H. C. (2013). Maintenance, Replacement, and Reliability: Theory and Applications, 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429021565.
[15] Nelson, W. (1982). Applied Life Data Analysis. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470316795.