Multi-Parameter Vibration Analysis for Bearing Fault Detection at Low Speeds Using Standard Accelerometers with Stud and Magnetic Mounting
Abstract
Detecting bearing defects at low rotational speeds remains a major challenge due to weak impulsive responses and dominant low-frequency components. This study evaluated the feasibility of using a standard industrial accelerometer (1 µA/ms², equivalent to 100 mV/g) for detecting outer race defects in bearings operating at 100–300 RPM. Experiments were conducted under both baseline and defected conditions using two mounting configurations: stud and magnetic. Vibration responses were analysed through overall values (velocity, acceleration, and shock pulse), spectral analysis, enveloped signals, and time waveform comparisons. Results show that standard accelerometers can effectively detect bearing defect signatures in low-speed machines (100–300 RPM), with diagnostic performance strongly influenced by the sensor mounting method. At 100 RPM, magnetic mounting occasionally recorded higher acceleration readings (?30%) due to uneven impulsive energy distribution and low-speed dynamic instability. At higher speeds (200–300 RPM), stud mounting produced stronger and more stable responses, with amplitudes about 2–8% higher than magnetic mounting, confirming its superior coupling rigidity. Spectral analysis alone was limited by broadband noise, while time waveform and envelope analyses revealed clearer defect-related impacts, particularly at 1× RPM and 2× BPFO. Overall, stud-mounted sensors demonstrated more consistent and reliable performance, validating their suitability for accurate and practical low-speed vibration monitoring.
References
[2] Randall, R.B. (2011). Vibration-based condition monitoring: Wiley.
[3] Tandon, N., & Choudhury, A. (1999). A review of vibration and acoustic measurement methods for the detection of defects in rolling element bearings. Tribology International, 32(8), 469–480.
[4] International Organization for Standardization. (2015). Condition monitoring and diagnostics of machines — Vibration condition monitoring — Part 3: Guidelines for vibration diagnosis (ISO Standard No. 13373-3).https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/40840/1b24cf9678c241bdbdb4edef67ca32c2/ISO-13373-3-2015.pdf.
[5] McFadden, P.D., & Smith, J.D. (1984). Vibration monitoring of rolling element bearings by the high-frequency resonance technique—A review. Tribology International, 17(1), 3–10.
[6] Jardine, A.K.S., Lin, D., &Banjevic, D. (2006). A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 20(7), 1483–1510.
[7] Mobius Institute. (2020). Practical vibration analysis [Training manual]. Mobius Institute.
[8] Bently Nevada. (2003). Rolling element bearing methodology application guide (Publication No. 164934). GE Energy. https://www.scribd.com/document/460007014/Rolling-Element-Bearing-Methodology-Application-Guide-164934-pdf.
[9] Harris, T.A., &Kotzalas, M.N. (2006). Rolling bearing analysis: CRC Press.
[10] Huang, Y., et al. (2023). Fault diagnosis of low-speed rolling bearing based on adaptive techniques. Wind Energy, 26(5), 471–485.
[11] Gruber, H., et al. (2024). Evaluation of a condition monitoring algorithm for early bearing failure detection. Machines, 12(2), 142.
[12] Qiu, H., Lee, J., Lin, J., & Yu, G. (2006). Wavelet filter-based weak signature detection method and its application on rolling element bearing prognostics. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 289(4–5), 1066–1090.
[13] PCB Piezotronics. (2005). Accelerometer selection considerations: Charge and ICP® integrated circuit piezoelectric [Technical Note TN-17]. https://www.pcb.com/contentstore/MktgContent/LinkedDocuments/Technotes/TN-17_VIB-0805.pdf.
[14] El-Thalji, I., &J antunen, E. (2015). A summary of fault modelling and predictive health monitoring of rolling element bearings. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 60, 252–272.
[15] Fort, A., et al. (2023). A low-complexity rolling bearing diagnosis technique combining vibration and speed measurements. Sensors, 23(17), 7546.
[16] Randall, R.B., & Antoni, J. (2011). Rolling element bearing diagnostics—A tutorial. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 25(2), 485–520.
[17] Smith, W.A., & Randall, R.B. (2015). Rolling element bearing diagnostics using the Case Western Reserve University data: A benchmark study. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 64–65, 100–131.
[18] Wu, G., et al. (2022). A review on rolling bearing fault signal detection methods based on different sensors. Sensors, 22(21), 8349.
[19] Sun, B., et al. (2025). State-of-the-art detection and diagnosis methods for rolling bearing defects: A comprehensive review. Applied Sciences, 15(2), 1001.
[20] Hakim, M., et al. (2023). A systematic review of rolling bearing fault diagnoses. Petroleum Science and Engineering, 219, 111129.
[21] Septano, G.D., Ikbal, F., Fathoni, S., Bahri, S.S., &Putri, S.M.M. (2024). Detection of damage motor and coal crusher in power plant TanjungEnim 3 × 10 MW using vibration analysis. JOMAse, 68(3), 155–160. doi:10.36842/jomase.v68i3.378.
