Advancing Casing Head Design on Wellhead Equipment Under Hydrostatic Pressure Using Finite Element Analysis
Abstract
Ensuring the structural integrity of casing heads under high-pressure conditions is crucial in oil and gas well safety. This study applies Finite Element Analysis (FEA) using Solid-Works 2024 to evaluate a 13-5/8 5K × 13-3/8 5K casing head design under hydrostatic pressure up to 7,500 psi, following API 6A standards. Unlike conventional designs that rely on a single material, this research compares AISI 4130 alloy steel and Stainless Steel 410 to assess their structural performance and interchangeability. The simulation analyzed stress distribution and deformation, revealing both materials stayed well within safe limits, with a maximum Von Mises stress of 18,196 psi and deformation of 0.00006112 inch. The results demonstrate that material substitution is structurally viable, offering a cost-effective and supply-chain-resilient solution. The novelty lies in validating design adequacy through simulation of the weaker material, confirming its suitability for both. This method enhances design flexibility and material selection strategies for pressure-containing components.
References
[2] Rystad Energy. (n.d.). 118,500 oil & gas wells to be drilled worldwide through 2022. OilPrice.com. https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/118500-Oil-Gas-Wells-To-Be-Drilled-Worldwide-Through-2022.
[3] Smith, J. & Thompson, L. (2020). Fundamentals of oil and gas well design. Energy Press.
[4] Bhara, J., Energi, P., Marsiyanto, N., Rasyd, A., & Widianto, S. (2022). Perbandingan pemilihan antara tipe wellhead conventional dengan wellhead unihead. BPE: Buletin Pusat Energi, Universitas Bhayangkara. http://ejurnal.ubharajaya.ac.id/index.php/BPE.
[5] Song, F., Sanchez, C., Li, K., Robinson, S. & Guidry, K. (2021). Digital system integration testing of surface wellhead systems. In ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Proceedings (IMECE). https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2021-72202
[6] Jaculli, M.A., Mendes, J.R.P. & Colombo, D. (2022). Evaluation of excessive wellhead motions: Framework of analysis and case studies (Part I). Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109571.
[7] American Petroleum Institute. (2018). API specification 6A – Wellhead and Christmas tree equipment (21st ed.).
[8] Khalil, M., Sanchez, C., Robinson, S., Guidry, K. & Li, K. (2020). Design and safety considerations in wellhead systems. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 72(6), 94-100.
[9] Schlumberger Oilfield Glossary. (2025). Wellhead definitions and components. Schlumberger.
[10] Ramesh, K. (2019). Finite element analysis in oilfield component testing. Mechanical Simulation Journal, 15(2), 58-66.
[11] American Society for Metals. (2017). AISI 4130 steel data sheet. In Materials Handbook (Vol. 12, pp. 315-320).
[12] Nguyen, T. & Lee, B. (2021). Comparative study of AISI 4130 and stainless steel for pressure components. Engineering Materials, 44(1), 33-42.
[13] American Society for Metals. (1990). ASM handbook volume 1: Properties and selection: Irons, steels, and high-performance alloys (Vol. 1). ASM International.
[14] Lampman, S.R., et al. (2004). ASM handbook volume 19: Fatigue and fracture. ASM International.
[15] American Petroleum Institute. (2019). API 6X: Design calculations for pressure-containing equipment (2nd ed.).
[16] Collins, J.A. (1993). Failure of materials in mechanical design: analysis, prediction, prevention. John Wiley & Sons.
[17] Petroski, H. (2019). Engineering: Overlooked or Ignored Modes of Failure. American Scientist, 107(2), 90-93.
[18] Boiler, A.S.M.E. (1998). ASME boiler and pressure vessel code: an international code (pp. 28-29). New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
[19] Veritas, D.N. (2008). Structural analysis of piping systems. Det Norske Veritas, Høvik, Norway, Standard No. DNV RP-D101.
[20] Lampman, S.R., et al. (Eds.). (2002). ASM handbook: Volume 19 – Fatigue and fracture. ASM International.
