Concept of Gap Distance in Motion Interaction between Multiple Floating Bodies
Abstract
Conceptual study on gap distance between multiple floating structures system was related to the effect of wave particle motion on structure motion. The evaluation on the gap distance between floating structures is an important study for multiple floating structures system especially for deep water liquefied natural gas, LNG exploration because the small gap distance between floating structures is needed to guarantee the effectiveness of LNG transfer. This conceptual study only discussed the effect of wave particle motion to the varying of gap distance between structures based on theoretical point of view. The expected result was generated by simple harmonic motion equation but it is no been validate in this paper. The expected result shown that the wave length and the structures initial gap distance give a significant effect to the minimum gap distance can be achieved by two floating structures. The mentioned minimum gap distance in this paper mean minimum distance between two floating structures achieved due to surge motions induced by wave. In addition, the comparison to various selected case found that at the condition where one structure face wave crest and other structure face wave trough will caused closest minimum gap distance between floating structures but minimum gap distance will be the largest if both structures face wave crest and wave trough at simultaneously. Therefore, proper selection of initial gap distance for different ocean condition can help to avoid crashing happen on structures when experience wave induced motion.
References
2. Abyn, H., Maimun, A., Jaswar, Rafiqul Islam, M., Magee, A., Bodagi, B., Pauzi, M. (2012). Effect of Mesh Number on Accuracy of Semi-Submersible Motion Prediction. Proc. of the 6th Asia-Pacific Workshop on Marine Hydrodynamics (APHydro 2012). UTM, Malaysia (2012).
3. Choi, Y. R.,Hong, S. Y. (2002). An analysis of hydrodynamic interaction of floating multi-body using higher-order boundary element method. Proc. of 12th ISOPE. Kita-Kyushu.
4. Clauss, G. F., Schmittner, C., Stutz, K.(2002). Time-Domain Investigation of a Semi-Submersible in Rogue Waves. Proc. of the 21st International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering (OMAE2002).
5. Hess, J. L., Smith, A. M. O.(1964). Calculation of Non-lifting Potential Flow About Arbitrary 3D Bodies. Journal of Ship Research.
6. Hong, S. Y., Kim, J. H., Cho, S. K., Choi, Y. R., Kim, Y. S. (2005). Numerical and experimental study on hydro dynamic interaction of side-by-side moored multiple vessels. Ocean Engineering, 32(7),783-801.
7. Ioannis,K. C. (2011). Three dimensional wave scattering by arrays of elliptical and circular cylinders. Ocean Engineering, Vol. 38(13), pp. 1480-1494.
8. Kashiwagi, M. and Q.-q.Shi. (2010). Pressure distribution computed by wave-interaction theory for adjacent multiple bodies. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 22(5, Supplement1):p. 526-531.
9. Kodan,N. (1984). The motions of adjacent floating structures in oblique waves. Proc. of Third Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering OMAE, New Orleans.
10. Koo, B. J., Kim, M. H.(2005). Hydrodynamic interactions and relative motions of two floating platforms with mooring lines in side-by-side offloading operation. Applied Ocean Research, 27(6),292-310.
11. Loken, A. E. (1981). Hydrodynamic interaction between several floating bodies of arbitrary form in Waves. Proc. of International Symposium on Hydrodynamics in Ocean Engineering, NIT, Trondheim.
12. Ohkusu, M., (1974). Ship motions in vicinity of a structure. Proc. of International Conference on Behavior of Offshore Structure. NIT, Trondheim.
13. Siow, C.L., Jaswar, Afrizal, E., Abyn, H., Adi, M., Pauzi, M. (2013). Comparative of Hydrodynamic Effect between Double Bodies to Single Body in Tank. The 8th International Conference On Numerical Analysis In Engineering. Pekanbaru, Indonesia.
14. Söylemez, M. (1995). Motion tests of a twin-hulled semi-submersible. Ocean Engineering, 22(6),643-660.
15. Spyros A. M. (2004). Hydrodynamic coefficients in heave of two concentric surface-piercing truncated circular cylinders. Applied Ocean Research, Vol. 26 (3-4), pp. 84-97.
16. Tajali, Z. and Shafieefar, M. (2011).Hydrodynamic analysis of multi-body floating piers under wave action. Ocean Engineering, 38(17–18):p. 1925-1933.
17. Van Oortmerssen, G. (1979). Hydrodynamic interaction between two structures of floating in waves. Proc. of BOSS‘79. Second International Conference on Behavior of Offshore Structures, London.
18. Wu,S., Murray, J. J., Virk, G. S. (1997). The motions and internal forces of a moored semi-submersible in regular waves. Ocean Engineering, 24(7), 593-603.
19. Yilmaz, O., Incecik, A. (1996). Extreme motion response analysis of moored semi-submersibles. Ocean Engineering, 23(6), 497-517.
20. Zhao, W.H, Yang, J.M, and Hu, Z.Q. (2012). Hydro dynamic interaction between FLNG vessel and LNG carrier in side by side configuration. Journal of Hydrodynamics. Ser. B, Vol.24, Issue 5, Pages 648-657.
21. Zhu, H.-r., Zhu,R.-c., Miao,G.-p. (2008). A Time Domain Investigation on the Hydrodynamic Resonance Phenomena of 3-D Multiple Floating Structures. Journal of Hydro dynamics. Ser. B, 20(5): p. 611-616.
22. Matos, V. L. F., Simos, A. N., and Sphaier, S. H. (2011). Second-order resonant heave, roll and pitch motions of a deep-draft semi-submersible: Theoretical and experimental results. Ocean Engineering. 38(17–18), 2227-2243.
23. Tiau, K.U., Jaswar, Abyn, H. and Siow, C.L. (2012). Study On Mobile Floating Harbor Concept. Proc. of the 6th Asia-Pacific Workshop on Marine Hydrodynamics (APHydro 2012). UTM, Malaysia.












