Review on Double Acting Tanker Ship in Ice Mode
Abstract
Podded propulsion system has been utilized to make revolutionary in the integrated ship propulsion and steering system due to diesel-electric and combining pod and rudder in the compact body. This paper would review utilization of podded propulsion system on the Double Acting Tanker (DAT) ship in ice mode. The DAT ship can be operated running ahead mode and astern mode in open water and ice conditions.
##Keywords:##
Ship in Ice, Double Acting Tanker, Podded and Rudder, Propulsion.
Published
Dec 30, 2016
How to Cite
AFRIZAL, Efi et al.
Review on Double Acting Tanker Ship in Ice Mode.
Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering-, [S.l.], v. 38, n. 1, p. 20 - 29, dec. 2016.
ISSN 2527-6085.
Available at: <https://isomase.org/Journals/index.php/jomase/article/view/396>. Date accessed: 29 apr. 2026.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.36842/jomase.v38i1.396.
References
1. Aker Artic Technology Inc. (2006) Artic Shuttle Tanker MT Norilsky Nickel, brochure. Helsinki, Finland.
2. Aker Artic Technology Inc. (2007) Artic Shuttle Tanker Vasily Dinkov, brochure. Helsinki, Finland. http://akerarctic.fi/sites/default/files/reference/fields/field_attachments/shi_tanker_esite.pdf.
3. Aker Artic Technology Inc. (2010) Artic Shuttle Tanker Mikhail Ulyanov, brochure. Helsinki,Finland. http://akerarctic.fi/sites/default/files/reference/fields/field_attachments/priraz_esitefin_0.pdf .
4. Bal, S., & Güner, M. (2009). Performance analysis of podded propulsors. Ocean Engineering, 36(8), 556-563.
5. Carlton, J. (2012). Marine propellers and propulsion. Butterworth-Heinemann.
6. Chen, H. C., & Lee, S. K. (2003, January). Chimera RANS simulation of propeller-ship interactions including crash-astern conditions. In The Thirteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers.
7. Choi, Y. H., Choi, H. Y., Lee, C. S., Kim, M. H., & Lee, J. M. (2012). Suggestion of a design load equation for ice-ship impacts. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 4(4), 386-402.
8. Daley, C., Tuhkuri, J., & Riska, K. (1998). The role of discrete failures in local ice loads. Cold regions science and technology, 27(3), 197-211.
9. G. Kuiper (1992). The Wageningen Propeller Series. MARIN Publication 92-001. Published on the occasion of its 60th anniversary, Wageningen. Netherlands.
10. Hänninen, S., Ojanen, M., Uuskallio, A., & Vuorio, J. (2007). Recent development of podded propulsion in arctic shipping. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering Under Arctic Conditions.
11. Islam, M. F., Veitch, B., & Liu, P. (2007). Experimental research on marine podded propulsors. Journal of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, 4(2), 57-71.
12. Islam, M., Jahra, F., Molyneux, D., & Hedd, L. (2015, March). Numerical Research on Usage of Podded Propulsors in Ice Management. In OTC Arctic Technology Conference. Offshore Technology Conference.
13. Jaswar, (2005). Determination of Optimum Hull of Ice Ship Going. In Proceedings of The 5th Osaka Colloqium (pp. 139-145).
14. Jones, S. J. (2004). Ships in ice-a review. In 25th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
15. Jones, S. J. (2008). A history of icebreaking ships. Journal of Ocean Technology, 3(1), 54-74.
16. Juurmaa, K., Mattsson, T., & Wilkman, G. (2001, August). The development of the new double acting ships for ice operation. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, POAC01 (Vol. 2, pp. 719-726).
17. Juurmaa, K., Mattsson, T., Sasaki, N., & Wilkman, G. (2002, February). The development of the double acting tanker for ice operation. In Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Okhotsk Sea & Sea Ice (pp. 24-28).
18. Karafiath, G., & Lyons, D. (1999, August). Pod propulsion hydrodynamics-US navy experience. In Proc. FAST (Vol. 99, pp. 119-135).
19. Kinnunen, A., Ville Lämsä, V., Koskinen, P., Jussila, M., Turunen, T., (2015). Marine Propeller-Ice Interaction Simulation And Blade Flexibility Effect On Contact Load. In the Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, June, Trondheim, Norway.
20. Kitagawa, H. (1982). Vessel Performance in Ice (Report No. 1). Abstract Note of 40th. General of SR L, 14-24. 21. Kubiak, K., (2014) Russian Double Action Ships. Arctic Shipping Revolution or Costly Experiment.
22. Lee, S. K. (2006). "Rational Approach to Integrate the Design of Propulsion Power and Propeller Strength for Ice Ships." ABS TECHNICAL PAPERS.
23. Lindqvist, G. (1989). A straightforward method for calculation of ice resistance of ships. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Artic Condition. Lulea, Sweden.
24. Lubbad, R., & Løset, S. (2011). A numerical model for real-time simulation of ship–ice interaction. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 65(2), 111-127.
25. Matsuzawa, T., Wako, D., & Izumiyama, K. (2006). Local ice load on a ship with podded propulsors. In Proc. of the 18th IAHR International Symposium on Ice (Vol. 2, pp. 33-40).
26. Milano, V.R., 1973. Ship resistance to continuous motion in ice. Trans. SNAME, Vol. 81, p. 274-306.
27. Moslet, P. O. (2008). Medium scale ice–structure interaction. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 54(2), 143-152.
28. Oosurveld, M. W. E., Van Oossanen, P., & Progress, I. S. (1975). Further computer-analyzed data of the Wageningen B-screw series.
29. Pakaste, R., Laukia, R., & Wihemson, M. Kuus koski,J. (1998) Experiences of Azipod Propulsion systems on board merchant vessels. In Proceedings of the All Electric Ship Conference (AES’98) (pp. 223-227). 30. Pakaste, R., Laukia, R., & Wihemson, M. Kuus koski,J.(1999) Experiences with Azipod Propulsion Systems on Board Marine vessels. In ABB Review 2 Marine Propulsion (pp. 12-18). ABB Azipod Oy. Helsinki. Finland.
31. Pivano, L., Bakkeheim, J., Johansen, T. A., & Smogeli, Ø. N. (2008). A Four-Quadrant Thrust Controller for Marine Propellers with Loss Estimation and Anti-Spin. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 41(2), 15010-15015.
32. Pivano, L., Johansen, T. A., Smogeli, O. N., & Fossen, T. I. (2007, July). Nonlinear thrust controller for marine propellers in four-quadrant operations. In 2007 American Control Conference (pp. 900-905). IEEE.
33. Sawamura, J., Riska, K., & Moan, T. (2008). Finite element analysis of fluid-ice interaction during ice bending. In Proceedings of the 19th IAHR Symposium on Ice, Vancouver, Canada (pp. 239-250).
34. Sodhi, D. S. (2001). Crushing failure during ice–structure interaction. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 68(17), 1889-1921.
35. Sodhi, D. S., Takeuchi, T., Nakazawa, N., Akagawa, S., & Saeki, H. (1998). Medium-scale indentation tests on sea ice at various speeds. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 28(3), 161-182.
36. Soininen, H. (1998). “A Propeller-Ice Contact Model”. Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation, Helsinky University of Technology.
37. Tan, X. (2014). Numerical Investigation of Ship's Continuous-Mode Icebreaking in Level Ice. Doctoral Theses, NTNU, Trondheim, Norwegian.
38. Tan, X., Riska, K., & Moan, T. (2014). Performance Simulation of a Dual-Direction Ship in Level Ice. Journal of Ship Research, 58(3), 168-181.
39. Tan, X., Su, B., Riska, K., & Moan, T. (2013). A six-degrees-of-freedom numerical model for level ice–ship interaction. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 92, 1-16.
40. Taylor, R. S., Jordaan, I. J., Li, C., & Sudom, D. (2010). Local design pressures for structures in ice: analysis of full-scale data. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 132(3), 031502.
41. Taylor, R., Veitch, B., & Bose, N. (2005). The influence of hub taper angle on podded propeller performance: propeller only tests versus podded propeller unit tests. In 7th Canadian Marine Hydromechanics and Structures Conference.
42. Vance, G. P. (1980). “Analysis of the Performance of a 140-foot Great Lakes Icebreaker”.USCGC KATMAI BAY (No. CRREL-80-8). Cold Regions Research and Engineering lab Hanover NH.
43. Wang, B., Yu, H. C., & Basu, R. (2008, January). Ship and ice collision modeling and strength evaluation of LNG ship structure. In ASME 2008 27th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering (pp. 911-918). American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
44. Wilkman, G. W. (2012, January). Technical and operational development of Icebreaking ships. In The Twenty-second International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers.
45. Wilkman, G., & Juurmaa, K. (2002). Design bases and project evaluation for ice operation. In Proc. of The 17 th International Symposium on Okhotsk Sea and Sea ice C (Vol. 16, pp. 405-417).
46. Wilkman, G., & Juurmaa, K., (2003). Design Bases and Project Evaluation for Ice Operation. In Proceedings of 17thInternational Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering Under Arctic Conditions.Trondheim, Norway.
47. Wilkman, G., Arpiainen, M., Niini, M., Mattsson, T., Bercha, F., & Bercha, S. (2006). Experience of Azipod Vessels in Ice. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Performance of Ships and Structures in Ice, ICETECH06-134-RF.
48. Zhou, L., Riska, K., Moan, T., & Su, B. (2013). Numerical modeling of ice loads on an icebreaking tanker: Comparing simulations with model tests. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 87, 33-46.
49. Zhou, L., Riska, K., und Polach, R. V. B., Moan, T., & Su, B. (2013). Experiments on level ice loading on an icebreaking tanker with different ice drift angles. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 85, 79-93.
2. Aker Artic Technology Inc. (2007) Artic Shuttle Tanker Vasily Dinkov, brochure. Helsinki, Finland. http://akerarctic.fi/sites/default/files/reference/fields/field_attachments/shi_tanker_esite.pdf.
3. Aker Artic Technology Inc. (2010) Artic Shuttle Tanker Mikhail Ulyanov, brochure. Helsinki,Finland. http://akerarctic.fi/sites/default/files/reference/fields/field_attachments/priraz_esitefin_0.pdf .
4. Bal, S., & Güner, M. (2009). Performance analysis of podded propulsors. Ocean Engineering, 36(8), 556-563.
5. Carlton, J. (2012). Marine propellers and propulsion. Butterworth-Heinemann.
6. Chen, H. C., & Lee, S. K. (2003, January). Chimera RANS simulation of propeller-ship interactions including crash-astern conditions. In The Thirteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers.
7. Choi, Y. H., Choi, H. Y., Lee, C. S., Kim, M. H., & Lee, J. M. (2012). Suggestion of a design load equation for ice-ship impacts. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 4(4), 386-402.
8. Daley, C., Tuhkuri, J., & Riska, K. (1998). The role of discrete failures in local ice loads. Cold regions science and technology, 27(3), 197-211.
9. G. Kuiper (1992). The Wageningen Propeller Series. MARIN Publication 92-001. Published on the occasion of its 60th anniversary, Wageningen. Netherlands.
10. Hänninen, S., Ojanen, M., Uuskallio, A., & Vuorio, J. (2007). Recent development of podded propulsion in arctic shipping. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering Under Arctic Conditions.
11. Islam, M. F., Veitch, B., & Liu, P. (2007). Experimental research on marine podded propulsors. Journal of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, 4(2), 57-71.
12. Islam, M., Jahra, F., Molyneux, D., & Hedd, L. (2015, March). Numerical Research on Usage of Podded Propulsors in Ice Management. In OTC Arctic Technology Conference. Offshore Technology Conference.
13. Jaswar, (2005). Determination of Optimum Hull of Ice Ship Going. In Proceedings of The 5th Osaka Colloqium (pp. 139-145).
14. Jones, S. J. (2004). Ships in ice-a review. In 25th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
15. Jones, S. J. (2008). A history of icebreaking ships. Journal of Ocean Technology, 3(1), 54-74.
16. Juurmaa, K., Mattsson, T., & Wilkman, G. (2001, August). The development of the new double acting ships for ice operation. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, POAC01 (Vol. 2, pp. 719-726).
17. Juurmaa, K., Mattsson, T., Sasaki, N., & Wilkman, G. (2002, February). The development of the double acting tanker for ice operation. In Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Okhotsk Sea & Sea Ice (pp. 24-28).
18. Karafiath, G., & Lyons, D. (1999, August). Pod propulsion hydrodynamics-US navy experience. In Proc. FAST (Vol. 99, pp. 119-135).
19. Kinnunen, A., Ville Lämsä, V., Koskinen, P., Jussila, M., Turunen, T., (2015). Marine Propeller-Ice Interaction Simulation And Blade Flexibility Effect On Contact Load. In the Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, June, Trondheim, Norway.
20. Kitagawa, H. (1982). Vessel Performance in Ice (Report No. 1). Abstract Note of 40th. General of SR L, 14-24. 21. Kubiak, K., (2014) Russian Double Action Ships. Arctic Shipping Revolution or Costly Experiment.
22. Lee, S. K. (2006). "Rational Approach to Integrate the Design of Propulsion Power and Propeller Strength for Ice Ships." ABS TECHNICAL PAPERS.
23. Lindqvist, G. (1989). A straightforward method for calculation of ice resistance of ships. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Artic Condition. Lulea, Sweden.
24. Lubbad, R., & Løset, S. (2011). A numerical model for real-time simulation of ship–ice interaction. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 65(2), 111-127.
25. Matsuzawa, T., Wako, D., & Izumiyama, K. (2006). Local ice load on a ship with podded propulsors. In Proc. of the 18th IAHR International Symposium on Ice (Vol. 2, pp. 33-40).
26. Milano, V.R., 1973. Ship resistance to continuous motion in ice. Trans. SNAME, Vol. 81, p. 274-306.
27. Moslet, P. O. (2008). Medium scale ice–structure interaction. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 54(2), 143-152.
28. Oosurveld, M. W. E., Van Oossanen, P., & Progress, I. S. (1975). Further computer-analyzed data of the Wageningen B-screw series.
29. Pakaste, R., Laukia, R., & Wihemson, M. Kuus koski,J. (1998) Experiences of Azipod Propulsion systems on board merchant vessels. In Proceedings of the All Electric Ship Conference (AES’98) (pp. 223-227). 30. Pakaste, R., Laukia, R., & Wihemson, M. Kuus koski,J.(1999) Experiences with Azipod Propulsion Systems on Board Marine vessels. In ABB Review 2 Marine Propulsion (pp. 12-18). ABB Azipod Oy. Helsinki. Finland.
31. Pivano, L., Bakkeheim, J., Johansen, T. A., & Smogeli, Ø. N. (2008). A Four-Quadrant Thrust Controller for Marine Propellers with Loss Estimation and Anti-Spin. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 41(2), 15010-15015.
32. Pivano, L., Johansen, T. A., Smogeli, O. N., & Fossen, T. I. (2007, July). Nonlinear thrust controller for marine propellers in four-quadrant operations. In 2007 American Control Conference (pp. 900-905). IEEE.
33. Sawamura, J., Riska, K., & Moan, T. (2008). Finite element analysis of fluid-ice interaction during ice bending. In Proceedings of the 19th IAHR Symposium on Ice, Vancouver, Canada (pp. 239-250).
34. Sodhi, D. S. (2001). Crushing failure during ice–structure interaction. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 68(17), 1889-1921.
35. Sodhi, D. S., Takeuchi, T., Nakazawa, N., Akagawa, S., & Saeki, H. (1998). Medium-scale indentation tests on sea ice at various speeds. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 28(3), 161-182.
36. Soininen, H. (1998). “A Propeller-Ice Contact Model”. Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation, Helsinky University of Technology.
37. Tan, X. (2014). Numerical Investigation of Ship's Continuous-Mode Icebreaking in Level Ice. Doctoral Theses, NTNU, Trondheim, Norwegian.
38. Tan, X., Riska, K., & Moan, T. (2014). Performance Simulation of a Dual-Direction Ship in Level Ice. Journal of Ship Research, 58(3), 168-181.
39. Tan, X., Su, B., Riska, K., & Moan, T. (2013). A six-degrees-of-freedom numerical model for level ice–ship interaction. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 92, 1-16.
40. Taylor, R. S., Jordaan, I. J., Li, C., & Sudom, D. (2010). Local design pressures for structures in ice: analysis of full-scale data. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 132(3), 031502.
41. Taylor, R., Veitch, B., & Bose, N. (2005). The influence of hub taper angle on podded propeller performance: propeller only tests versus podded propeller unit tests. In 7th Canadian Marine Hydromechanics and Structures Conference.
42. Vance, G. P. (1980). “Analysis of the Performance of a 140-foot Great Lakes Icebreaker”.USCGC KATMAI BAY (No. CRREL-80-8). Cold Regions Research and Engineering lab Hanover NH.
43. Wang, B., Yu, H. C., & Basu, R. (2008, January). Ship and ice collision modeling and strength evaluation of LNG ship structure. In ASME 2008 27th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering (pp. 911-918). American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
44. Wilkman, G. W. (2012, January). Technical and operational development of Icebreaking ships. In The Twenty-second International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers.
45. Wilkman, G., & Juurmaa, K. (2002). Design bases and project evaluation for ice operation. In Proc. of The 17 th International Symposium on Okhotsk Sea and Sea ice C (Vol. 16, pp. 405-417).
46. Wilkman, G., & Juurmaa, K., (2003). Design Bases and Project Evaluation for Ice Operation. In Proceedings of 17thInternational Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering Under Arctic Conditions.Trondheim, Norway.
47. Wilkman, G., Arpiainen, M., Niini, M., Mattsson, T., Bercha, F., & Bercha, S. (2006). Experience of Azipod Vessels in Ice. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Performance of Ships and Structures in Ice, ICETECH06-134-RF.
48. Zhou, L., Riska, K., Moan, T., & Su, B. (2013). Numerical modeling of ice loads on an icebreaking tanker: Comparing simulations with model tests. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 87, 33-46.
49. Zhou, L., Riska, K., und Polach, R. V. B., Moan, T., & Su, B. (2013). Experiments on level ice loading on an icebreaking tanker with different ice drift angles. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 85, 79-93.
