Analyze Performance of Double Acting Tanker While Running Astern in Ice Condition
Abstract
The increasing of shipping activities through the Northern Sea Route (NSR) and growth of oil and gas activities in Arctic and Sub-Artic regions require suitable design of ice-going ships and planning operations in ice. In 2002, Sumitomo Heavy Industries has built advanced ice-ship called "Double Acting Tanker". This paper discussed application of new method to determine ice resistance of Double Acting Tanker running ahead in ice condition. The simulation was carried out at 1 m ice thickness in unfrozen and frozen channels and 0.5 m ice thickness in level ice condition. The simulation results were compared with experimental results.
##Keywords:##
Running Ahead; Ice Thickness; Double Acting Tanke.
Published
Jun 30, 2017
How to Cite
AFRIZAL, Efi; KOTO, Jaswar.
Analyze Performance of Double Acting Tanker While Running Astern in Ice Condition.
Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -science and engineering-, [S.l.], v. 44, n. 1, p. 8-20, june 2017.
ISSN 2527-6085.
Available at: <https://isomase.org/Journals/index.php/jomase/article/view/182>. Date accessed: 02 may 2026.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.36842/jomase.v44i1.182.
References
1. Aker Artic Technology Inc. (2010) Artic Shuttle Tanker Mikhail Ulyanov, brochure. Helsinki, Finland. http://akerarctic.fi/sites/default/files/reference/fields/field_attachments/priraz_esitefin_0.pdf.
2. Chen, H. C., & Lee, S. K. (2003). Chimera RANS simulation of propeller-ship interactions including crash-astern conditions, The Thirteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers.
3. Choi, Y. H., Choi, H. Y., Lee, C. S., Kim, M. H., & Lee, J. M. (2012). Suggestion of a design load equation for ice-ship impacts. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 4(4), 386-402.
4. Daley, C., Riska, K., & Smith, G. (1997). Ice Forces and Ship Response during Ramming and Shoulder Collisions. Transport Canada Report TP-13107E. Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada and Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland.
5. Daley, C., Tuhkuri, J., & Riska, K. (1998). The role of discrete failures in local ice loads. Cold regions science and technology, 27(3), 197-211.
6. Gürtner, A. (2009). Experimental and numerical investigations of ice-structure interaction, PhD Thesis, Department of Civil and Transport Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
7. Islam, M. F., Veitch, B., & Liu, P. (2007). Experimental research on marine podded propulsors. Journal of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, 4(2), 57-71.
8. Jaswar, (2005). Determination of Optimum Hull of Ice Ship Going. In Proceedings of the 5th Osaka Colloqium (pp. 139-145).
9. Jebaraj, C., Swamidas, A. S. J., Shih, L. Y., & Munaswamy, K. (1992). Finite element analysis of ship/ice interaction. Computers & structures,43(2), 205-221.
10. Jones, S. J. (2008). A history of icebreaking ships. Journal of Ocean Technology, 3(1), 54-74.
11. Juurmaa, K., Mattsson, T., Sasaki, N., & Wilkman, G. (2002). The development of the double acting tanker for ice operation. In Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Okhotsk Sea & Sea Ice (pp. 24-28).
12. Juva, M., & Riska, K. (2002). On the power requirement in the Finnish-Swedish ice class rules. Winter navigation Research Board, Res. Rpt, (53).
13. Kujala, P., & Arughadhoss, S. (2012). Statistical analysis of ice crushing pressures on a ship's hull during hull–ice interaction. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 70, 1-11.
14. Lee, S. K. (2006). "Rational Approach to Integrate the Design of Propulsion Power and Propeller Strength for Ice Ships." ABS TECHNICAL PAPERS.
15. Lindqvist, G. (1989). A straightforward method for calculation of ice resistance of ships. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Artic Condition. Lulea, Sweden.
16. Liukkonen, S. (1989). About Physical Modelling of Kinetic Friction Between Ice and Ship. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Artic Condition. Lulea, Sweden.
17. Lubbad, R., & Løset, S. (2011). A numerical model for real-time simulation of ship–ice interaction. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 65(2), 111-127.
18. Martio, J. (2007). Numerical simulation of vessel’s maneuvering performance in uniform ice. Report No. M-301, Ship Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology, Finland.
19. Niini, M. (2001). Improvement of Arctic Ships in the Light of Recent Technological Development. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering Under Arctic Conditions.
20. Pakaste, R., Laukia, R., & Wihemson, M. Kuus koski,J.(1998) Experiences of Azipod Propulsion systems on board merchant vessels. In Proceedings of the All Electric Ship Conference (AES’98) (pp. 223-227).
21. Park, H. G., Lee, Y. C., Ahn, S. M., Hwanbo, S. M., Jung, H. C., & Lee, J. H. (2008). A study on Bow Hull form Design and Propulsion Type for Ice breaking Vessel with the balance of Open and Ice performance. 22. Riska, K, Jalonen, R. (1994). Assessment of Ice Model Testing Techniques. Icetech 5th International Conference on Ships and Marine Structures in Cold Regions, Calgary, Canada. SNAME.
23. Riska, K., & Kämäräinen, J. (2011). A review of ice loading and the evolution of the finnish-swedish ice class rules. In Proceedings of the SNAME Annual Meeting and Expo. November (pp. 16-18).
24. Riska, Kaj., (2011). "Ship-Ice interaction in ship design: Theory and Practice." Course Material NTNU.
25. Sasaki, N., Laapio, J., Fagerstrom, B., Juurma, K., & Wilkman, G. (2004). Full scale performance of double acting tankers mastera & tempera. In Proceedings of Fist International Conference on Technological Advances in Podded Propulsion, University of Newcastle (pp. 155-172).
26. Su, B. (2011). Numerical predictions of global and local ice loads on ships. Doctoral Thesis. NTNU, Trondheim, Norwegian.
27. Su, B., Riska, K., & Moan, T. (2010). A numerical method for the prediction of ship performance in level ice. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 60(3), 177-188.
28. Su, B., Riska, K., & Moan, T. (2011). Numerical study of ice-induced loads on ship hulls. Marine Structures, 24(2), 132-152.
29. Tan, X. (2014). Numerical Investigation of Ship's Continuous-Mode Icebreaking in Level Ice. Doctoral Theses. Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
30. Tan, X., Riska, K., & Moan, T. (2014). Effect of dynamic bending of level ice on ship's continuous-mode icebreaking. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 106, 82-95.
31. Tan, X., Riska, K., & Moan, T. (2014). Performance Simulation of a Dual-Direction Ship in Level Ice. Journal of Ship Research, 58(3), 168-181.
32. Tan, X., Su, B., Riska, K., & Moan, T. (2013). A six-degrees-of-freedom numerical model for level ice–ship interaction. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 92, 1-16.
33. Valanto, P. (2001). The Resistance of Ships in Level Ice. SNAME Transactions, Vol. 109, (pp. 53-83).
34. Wang, J., & Jones, S. J. (2008). Resistance and propulsion of CCGS Terry Fox in ice from model tests to full scale correlation.
35. Wilkman, G. (2015, March). Development of icebreaking ships with ice model tests. In OTC Arctic Technology Conference. Offshore Technology Conference.
36. Wilkman, G., & Nini, M. (2011). Arctic transit: the Northern Sea Route and the Northwest Passage offer enormous opportunity while posing enormous challenge. (mt) Marine technology.
37. Yamaguchi, H., Suzuki, Y., Uemura, O., Kato, H., & Izumiyama, K. (1997). Influence of bow shape on icebreaking resistance in low speed range. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering (pp. 51-62). American Society Of Mechanical Engineers.
2. Chen, H. C., & Lee, S. K. (2003). Chimera RANS simulation of propeller-ship interactions including crash-astern conditions, The Thirteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers.
3. Choi, Y. H., Choi, H. Y., Lee, C. S., Kim, M. H., & Lee, J. M. (2012). Suggestion of a design load equation for ice-ship impacts. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 4(4), 386-402.
4. Daley, C., Riska, K., & Smith, G. (1997). Ice Forces and Ship Response during Ramming and Shoulder Collisions. Transport Canada Report TP-13107E. Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada and Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland.
5. Daley, C., Tuhkuri, J., & Riska, K. (1998). The role of discrete failures in local ice loads. Cold regions science and technology, 27(3), 197-211.
6. Gürtner, A. (2009). Experimental and numerical investigations of ice-structure interaction, PhD Thesis, Department of Civil and Transport Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
7. Islam, M. F., Veitch, B., & Liu, P. (2007). Experimental research on marine podded propulsors. Journal of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, 4(2), 57-71.
8. Jaswar, (2005). Determination of Optimum Hull of Ice Ship Going. In Proceedings of the 5th Osaka Colloqium (pp. 139-145).
9. Jebaraj, C., Swamidas, A. S. J., Shih, L. Y., & Munaswamy, K. (1992). Finite element analysis of ship/ice interaction. Computers & structures,43(2), 205-221.
10. Jones, S. J. (2008). A history of icebreaking ships. Journal of Ocean Technology, 3(1), 54-74.
11. Juurmaa, K., Mattsson, T., Sasaki, N., & Wilkman, G. (2002). The development of the double acting tanker for ice operation. In Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Okhotsk Sea & Sea Ice (pp. 24-28).
12. Juva, M., & Riska, K. (2002). On the power requirement in the Finnish-Swedish ice class rules. Winter navigation Research Board, Res. Rpt, (53).
13. Kujala, P., & Arughadhoss, S. (2012). Statistical analysis of ice crushing pressures on a ship's hull during hull–ice interaction. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 70, 1-11.
14. Lee, S. K. (2006). "Rational Approach to Integrate the Design of Propulsion Power and Propeller Strength for Ice Ships." ABS TECHNICAL PAPERS.
15. Lindqvist, G. (1989). A straightforward method for calculation of ice resistance of ships. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Artic Condition. Lulea, Sweden.
16. Liukkonen, S. (1989). About Physical Modelling of Kinetic Friction Between Ice and Ship. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Artic Condition. Lulea, Sweden.
17. Lubbad, R., & Løset, S. (2011). A numerical model for real-time simulation of ship–ice interaction. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 65(2), 111-127.
18. Martio, J. (2007). Numerical simulation of vessel’s maneuvering performance in uniform ice. Report No. M-301, Ship Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology, Finland.
19. Niini, M. (2001). Improvement of Arctic Ships in the Light of Recent Technological Development. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering Under Arctic Conditions.
20. Pakaste, R., Laukia, R., & Wihemson, M. Kuus koski,J.(1998) Experiences of Azipod Propulsion systems on board merchant vessels. In Proceedings of the All Electric Ship Conference (AES’98) (pp. 223-227).
21. Park, H. G., Lee, Y. C., Ahn, S. M., Hwanbo, S. M., Jung, H. C., & Lee, J. H. (2008). A study on Bow Hull form Design and Propulsion Type for Ice breaking Vessel with the balance of Open and Ice performance. 22. Riska, K, Jalonen, R. (1994). Assessment of Ice Model Testing Techniques. Icetech 5th International Conference on Ships and Marine Structures in Cold Regions, Calgary, Canada. SNAME.
23. Riska, K., & Kämäräinen, J. (2011). A review of ice loading and the evolution of the finnish-swedish ice class rules. In Proceedings of the SNAME Annual Meeting and Expo. November (pp. 16-18).
24. Riska, Kaj., (2011). "Ship-Ice interaction in ship design: Theory and Practice." Course Material NTNU.
25. Sasaki, N., Laapio, J., Fagerstrom, B., Juurma, K., & Wilkman, G. (2004). Full scale performance of double acting tankers mastera & tempera. In Proceedings of Fist International Conference on Technological Advances in Podded Propulsion, University of Newcastle (pp. 155-172).
26. Su, B. (2011). Numerical predictions of global and local ice loads on ships. Doctoral Thesis. NTNU, Trondheim, Norwegian.
27. Su, B., Riska, K., & Moan, T. (2010). A numerical method for the prediction of ship performance in level ice. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 60(3), 177-188.
28. Su, B., Riska, K., & Moan, T. (2011). Numerical study of ice-induced loads on ship hulls. Marine Structures, 24(2), 132-152.
29. Tan, X. (2014). Numerical Investigation of Ship's Continuous-Mode Icebreaking in Level Ice. Doctoral Theses. Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
30. Tan, X., Riska, K., & Moan, T. (2014). Effect of dynamic bending of level ice on ship's continuous-mode icebreaking. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 106, 82-95.
31. Tan, X., Riska, K., & Moan, T. (2014). Performance Simulation of a Dual-Direction Ship in Level Ice. Journal of Ship Research, 58(3), 168-181.
32. Tan, X., Su, B., Riska, K., & Moan, T. (2013). A six-degrees-of-freedom numerical model for level ice–ship interaction. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 92, 1-16.
33. Valanto, P. (2001). The Resistance of Ships in Level Ice. SNAME Transactions, Vol. 109, (pp. 53-83).
34. Wang, J., & Jones, S. J. (2008). Resistance and propulsion of CCGS Terry Fox in ice from model tests to full scale correlation.
35. Wilkman, G. (2015, March). Development of icebreaking ships with ice model tests. In OTC Arctic Technology Conference. Offshore Technology Conference.
36. Wilkman, G., & Nini, M. (2011). Arctic transit: the Northern Sea Route and the Northwest Passage offer enormous opportunity while posing enormous challenge. (mt) Marine technology.
37. Yamaguchi, H., Suzuki, Y., Uemura, O., Kato, H., & Izumiyama, K. (1997). Influence of bow shape on icebreaking resistance in low speed range. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering (pp. 51-62). American Society Of Mechanical Engineers.
