Analysis Resistance on Ice-Hull Interaction of Double Acting Tanker using Couple Eulerian Langrangian in Abaqus Simulation
Abstract
This article will discuss the magnitude of resistance force when ships is sailing head or astern in the ice sea. Normally only icebreaker is able to travel on it but in this article will be reviewed special ship a double acting tanker (DAT). This ship was sailing head in open sea ice and astern in the ice sea. This can be done because the presence of azipods in driving system. The approach was carried out using simulation program with base on finite element method. Abaqus has ability to calculate interaction between fluid and solid by Couple Eulerian Langrangian (CEL) facility. While the ship model is made using Rhinoceros software because has Non Uniform Rational Basis Spline (NURBS) facility, so all curves and surface designs have qualify the mathematical rules for computer graphics.
##Keywords:##
CEL, DAT, Abaqus, Rhinoceros
Published
Nov 18, 2018
How to Cite
AFRIZAL, Efi et al.
Analysis Resistance on Ice-Hull Interaction of Double Acting Tanker using Couple Eulerian Langrangian in Abaqus Simulation.
Proceeding of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -Science and Engineering-, [S.l.], v. 5, n. 1, p. 63-70, nov. 2018.
ISSN 2443-1710. Available at: <https://isomase.org/Journals/index.php/pomase/article/view/65>. Date accessed: 16 mar. 2025.
Issue
Section
Articles
References
1. Lewis, J.W., and Edwards, R.Y. Jr., 1970. Methods for Predicting Icebreaking and Ice Resistance Characteristics of Icebreakers. Trans. SNAME, Vol. 78, p. 213-249.
2. Crago, W.A., Dix, P.J., and German, J.G., 1971. Model Icebreaking Experiments and Their Correlation with Full-Scale Data. Trans. RINA, Vol. 113, p. 83-108.
3. Enkvist, E., 1972. On the Ice Resistance Encountered by Ships Operating in the Continuous Mode of Icebreaking. The Swedish Academy of Engineering Sciences in Finland, Helsinki, Report No. 24, 181 pp.
4. Milano, V.R., 1973. Ship Resistance to Continuous Motion in Ice. Trans. SNAME, Vol. 81, p. 274-306.
5. Vance, G.P., 1975. A scaling system for ships modelled in ice. Proc. SNAME Ice Tech. Symposium, Montreal, Paper H1, 28pp.
6. Vance, G. P. (1980). “Analysis of the Performance of a 140-foot Great Lakes Icebreakerâ€. USCGC Katmai Bay (No. CRREL-80-8). Cold Regions Research and Engineering lab Hanover NH.
7. Lindqvist, G. (1989). A straightforward method for calculation of ice resistance of ships. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Artic Condition. Lulea, Sweden.
8. Keinonen, A.J., Browne, R., Revill, C., Reynolds, A., 1996. Icebreaker Characteristics Synthesis, Report TP 12812E. The Transportation Development Centre, Transport Canada, Ontario.
9. Ramming and Shoulder Collisions. Transport Canada Report TP-13107E. Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada and Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland.
10. Daley, C., Tuhkuri, J., & Riska, K. (1998). The role of discrete failures in local ice loads. Cold regions science and technology, 27(3), 197-211.
11. Jaswar, (2002). A Prediction Method of Ice Breaking of an Icebreaker, Seminar of Applied Physics, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia.
12. Jaswar, (2005). Determination of Optimum Hull of Ice Ship Goin, Proceedings of the 5th Osaka Colloquium (pp. 139-145).
13. Su, B., Riska, K., & Moan, T. (2010). A numerical method for the prediction of ship performance in level ice. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 60(3), 177-188.
14. Jeong, S.Y., Lee, C.J., Cho, S.R., 2010. Ice resistance prediction for standard icebreaker model ship. In: Proceedings of the Twentieth (2010) International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Beijing, China, 20-25 June 2010, pp. 1300-1304.
15. Tan, X., Riska, K., & Moan, T. (2014). Performance Simulation of a Dual-Direction Ship in Level Ice. Journal of Ship Research, 58(3), 168-181.
16. Tan, X., Su, B., Riska, K., & Moan, T. (2013). A six-degrees-of-freedom numerical model for level ice–ship interaction. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 92, 1-16.
17. Hu, J., Zhou, L., May 2015. Experimental and numerical study on ice resistance for icebreaking vessels. Int. J. Nav. Archit. Ocean Eng. 7 (3), 626-639.
18. Hu. J and Zhou. L, 2016, Further study on level ice resistance and channel resistance for an icebreaking vessel, International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering 8 (2016) 169-176.
19. Jeong. S.Y., Choi. K, Kang. K.J and Ha. J.S, 2017, Prediction of ship resistance in level ice based on empirical approach, International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, (2017) 1-11.
20. Efi Afrizal, and Jaswar Koto. (2014) Study on Performance of Double Acting Tanker in Ice Condition. The 1st Conference on Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace.
21. Afrizal, E., and J. Koto. (2014). Ice Resistance Performance Analysis of Double Acting Tanker in Astern Condition. Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences and Engineering) 69.7: 73-78.
22. Efi Afrizal, J.Koto, Wahid, M. A and C. L. Siow. (2016). Review on Double Acting Tanker Ship in Ice Mode. Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace, Vol.38.
23. Efi Afrizal, and J. Koto. (2016). Study on Development of Ice-Ship. Proceeding of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -Science and Engineering-, Vol.3.
24. Jaswar. Koto and Efi Afrizal, (2017). Empirical Approach to Predict Ship Resistance in Level Ice, Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace, Vol.45.
25. Efi Afrizal, and Jaswar. Koto. (2017). Analyze Performance of Double Acting Tanker while Running Astern in Ice Condition, Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace, Vol.44.
26. Kubiak, K., (2014) Russian Double Action Ships. Arctic Shipping Revolution or Costly Experiment
27. Juurmaa, K., Mattsson, T., & Wilkman, G. (2001, August). The development of the new double acting ships for ice operation. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, POAC01 (Vol. 2, pp. 719-726).
28. Juurmaa, K., Mattsson, T., Sasaki, N., & Wilkman, G. (2002, February). The development of the double acting tanker for ice operation. In Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Okhotsk Sea & Sea Ice (pp. 24-28).
29. International Towing Tank Conference. (2011) Practical Guidelines for Ship CFD
30. ABAQUS theory manual 6.13 (2013): ABAQUS theory manual, ABAQUS 6.13 documentation, Software Manual, Dassault Systemes.
31. Tutorial of Rhinoceros, (2018) https://www.rhino3d.com/tutorials
2. Crago, W.A., Dix, P.J., and German, J.G., 1971. Model Icebreaking Experiments and Their Correlation with Full-Scale Data. Trans. RINA, Vol. 113, p. 83-108.
3. Enkvist, E., 1972. On the Ice Resistance Encountered by Ships Operating in the Continuous Mode of Icebreaking. The Swedish Academy of Engineering Sciences in Finland, Helsinki, Report No. 24, 181 pp.
4. Milano, V.R., 1973. Ship Resistance to Continuous Motion in Ice. Trans. SNAME, Vol. 81, p. 274-306.
5. Vance, G.P., 1975. A scaling system for ships modelled in ice. Proc. SNAME Ice Tech. Symposium, Montreal, Paper H1, 28pp.
6. Vance, G. P. (1980). “Analysis of the Performance of a 140-foot Great Lakes Icebreakerâ€. USCGC Katmai Bay (No. CRREL-80-8). Cold Regions Research and Engineering lab Hanover NH.
7. Lindqvist, G. (1989). A straightforward method for calculation of ice resistance of ships. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Artic Condition. Lulea, Sweden.
8. Keinonen, A.J., Browne, R., Revill, C., Reynolds, A., 1996. Icebreaker Characteristics Synthesis, Report TP 12812E. The Transportation Development Centre, Transport Canada, Ontario.
9. Ramming and Shoulder Collisions. Transport Canada Report TP-13107E. Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada and Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland.
10. Daley, C., Tuhkuri, J., & Riska, K. (1998). The role of discrete failures in local ice loads. Cold regions science and technology, 27(3), 197-211.
11. Jaswar, (2002). A Prediction Method of Ice Breaking of an Icebreaker, Seminar of Applied Physics, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia.
12. Jaswar, (2005). Determination of Optimum Hull of Ice Ship Goin, Proceedings of the 5th Osaka Colloquium (pp. 139-145).
13. Su, B., Riska, K., & Moan, T. (2010). A numerical method for the prediction of ship performance in level ice. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 60(3), 177-188.
14. Jeong, S.Y., Lee, C.J., Cho, S.R., 2010. Ice resistance prediction for standard icebreaker model ship. In: Proceedings of the Twentieth (2010) International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Beijing, China, 20-25 June 2010, pp. 1300-1304.
15. Tan, X., Riska, K., & Moan, T. (2014). Performance Simulation of a Dual-Direction Ship in Level Ice. Journal of Ship Research, 58(3), 168-181.
16. Tan, X., Su, B., Riska, K., & Moan, T. (2013). A six-degrees-of-freedom numerical model for level ice–ship interaction. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 92, 1-16.
17. Hu, J., Zhou, L., May 2015. Experimental and numerical study on ice resistance for icebreaking vessels. Int. J. Nav. Archit. Ocean Eng. 7 (3), 626-639.
18. Hu. J and Zhou. L, 2016, Further study on level ice resistance and channel resistance for an icebreaking vessel, International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering 8 (2016) 169-176.
19. Jeong. S.Y., Choi. K, Kang. K.J and Ha. J.S, 2017, Prediction of ship resistance in level ice based on empirical approach, International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, (2017) 1-11.
20. Efi Afrizal, and Jaswar Koto. (2014) Study on Performance of Double Acting Tanker in Ice Condition. The 1st Conference on Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace.
21. Afrizal, E., and J. Koto. (2014). Ice Resistance Performance Analysis of Double Acting Tanker in Astern Condition. Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences and Engineering) 69.7: 73-78.
22. Efi Afrizal, J.Koto, Wahid, M. A and C. L. Siow. (2016). Review on Double Acting Tanker Ship in Ice Mode. Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace, Vol.38.
23. Efi Afrizal, and J. Koto. (2016). Study on Development of Ice-Ship. Proceeding of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace -Science and Engineering-, Vol.3.
24. Jaswar. Koto and Efi Afrizal, (2017). Empirical Approach to Predict Ship Resistance in Level Ice, Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace, Vol.45.
25. Efi Afrizal, and Jaswar. Koto. (2017). Analyze Performance of Double Acting Tanker while Running Astern in Ice Condition, Journal of Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace, Vol.44.
26. Kubiak, K., (2014) Russian Double Action Ships. Arctic Shipping Revolution or Costly Experiment
27. Juurmaa, K., Mattsson, T., & Wilkman, G. (2001, August). The development of the new double acting ships for ice operation. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions, POAC01 (Vol. 2, pp. 719-726).
28. Juurmaa, K., Mattsson, T., Sasaki, N., & Wilkman, G. (2002, February). The development of the double acting tanker for ice operation. In Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Okhotsk Sea & Sea Ice (pp. 24-28).
29. International Towing Tank Conference. (2011) Practical Guidelines for Ship CFD
30. ABAQUS theory manual 6.13 (2013): ABAQUS theory manual, ABAQUS 6.13 documentation, Software Manual, Dassault Systemes.
31. Tutorial of Rhinoceros, (2018) https://www.rhino3d.com/tutorials
